ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Rusk County, Texas

Longview, TX · Population 52,842
9 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$68,658 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
4.4% down from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$2.8B down from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
17.5% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$68,658 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$33,876 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$94,041 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$76,713 metro RPP 89.5
Poverty Rate
14.4% up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Rusk County$68,658
Texas$78,476
National$80,734
Rusk County is $9,818 (12.5%) below the Texas median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Longview, TX, 89.5 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the metro index stands in for Rusk County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 17.5% (9,225 residents) 55-64: 12.4% (6,578 residents) 35-54: 25.8% (13,608 residents) 18-34: 21.8% (11,501 residents) Under 18: 22.6% (11,930 residents) 39 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 22.6%
18-34 · 21.8%
35-54 · 25.8%
55-64 · 12.4%
65+ · 17.5%
Race & Ethnicity
White65.6%
Two or More Races17.4%
Black or African American13.2%
Some Other Race3.2%
Asian0.4%
American Indian and Alaska Native0.1%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0.1%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)19.1%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
84.8%
High School+
National: 89.6%
down from national 4.8 pts vs national
17.5%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
down from national 18.2 pts vs national
5.9%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 8.2 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
52,842
Population
22,476
Labor Force
Employed
21,474
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.4% down from 2024 0.1 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute
26.6 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.1%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $9,818 (12.5%) under the Texas median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
  • Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 10.5% below the national average, so the nominal median of $68,658 is worth $76,713 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at metro level, not county level.
  • Elevated poverty: At 14.4%, the rate is in economically distressed territory and supports federal funding narratives (CDFI, NMTC, EDA).
  • Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 18.2 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$2.8B down from 2023 -7.3% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
-7.3% real (inflation-adjusted) · -8% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
89.5
Cost of Living · metro · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Rusk County, Texas, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Health Care and Social Assistance
1,736 18.4%
$39,343
2Manufacturing
1,233 13.1%
$57,615
3Retail Trade
1,219 12.9%
$36,180
4Construction
1,092 11.6%
$51,134
5Accommodation and Food Services
977 10.4%
$22,081
6Administrative and Support and Waste Management
931 9.9%
$50,578
7Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
752 8.0%
$97,641
8Finance and Insurance
610 6.5%
$88,728
9Wholesale Trade
501 5.3%
$61,165
10Utilities
380 4.0%
$140,469
Government employment · context only
2,785

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 10,523 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Health Care and Social Assistance employs 1,736 workers (18.4% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $39,343. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 2,785 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $2.8B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Utilities averages $140,469 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $22,081, a 6.4x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Support Activities for Mining here.
Support Activities for Mining
30.29x
637
Forestry and Logging
22.93x
83
Wood Product Manufacturing
8.94x
284
Utilities
7.99x
380
Mining (except Oil and Gas)
6.20x
92
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
5.75x
538
Oil and Gas Extraction
2.49x
23
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
2.46x
499
Construction of Buildings
2.25x
331
Rental and Leasing Services
2.13x
96
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
1.86x
201
Repair and Maintenance
1.63x
188
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
1.53x
127

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
13 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Construction Cluster at 25% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
2,963
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
30.29x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail, Highest 10 By LQ
Support Activities for Mining
30.29x 637
Forestry and Logging
22.93x 83
Wood Product Manufacturing
8.94x 284
Utilities
7.99x 380
Mining (except Oil and Gas)
6.20x 92
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
5.75x 538
Oil and Gas Extraction
2.49x 23
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
2.46x 499
Construction of Buildings
2.25x 331
Rental and Leasing Services
2.13x 96
+ 3 more sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5, holding a further 516 jobs not counted in the total above. See the spider chart for the broader picture.

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.28x
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
234 employed
0.39x
Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
81 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in Texas costs 6.55¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). Texas has 20 rail-truck intermodal terminals, the nearest 118 miles from the county. Land area 924 sq mi, larger than 76% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Support Activities for Mining concentrates at 30.29x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 13 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 25% of the employment across them, the largest being construction and real estate cycle. Demand reaches this base from more than one market rather than from a single one.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Rusk County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$171,300 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,015 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
78.8% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
15.4% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
2.6% available
for rent or sale
2.5x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Affordable
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$890/mo
1 Bedroom
$895/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,175/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,451/mo
4 Bedroom
$1,606/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,051/mo, from a renter median of $42,034) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 36.8% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 18.2% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Affordable market: Home value to income ratio of 2.5x is well below the ~4.1x national average; supports talent attraction and family settlement narratives.
  • High home ownership: 78.8% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 15.4% of housing units are vacant, above the Texas rate of 9.4%, and down from 16.6% in 2019.
  • Vacancy composition: the largest vacancy category is other vacant at 53.6% of vacant units, with seasonal and recreational use at 23.9%.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 17.2% of the vacant stock, or 2.6% of all housing units against the 15.4% headline vacancy rate. Absorbable supply for an incoming employer is thin, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 2 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $42,034 can pay without cost burden (~$1,051/mo), and 36.8% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
31,687 down from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute
26.6 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.1%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
65.5%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 52.9%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 53% Participation
of population age 16 and over (42,462)
unchanged from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
17.5% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
84.8% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Rusk County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Rusk County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
20.8%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 12.4% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
31.2%
Service
16.3%
Sales & Office
20.8%
Construction / Maint.
13.8%
Production / Transport
17.9%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 40% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 21,474 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Low participation: 52.9% labor force participation. The labor force itself fell 1.7% between 2019 and 2024, from 22,857 to 22,476.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Rusk County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Rusk County shows strong potential for support activities for mining attraction, with a 30.29x concentration and 637 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally.

The concentrated base spans support activities for mining, forestry and logging, and wood product manufacturing, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 25% of the employment across them, the largest being construction and real estate cycle. Supply-chain recruitment has more than one demand base to work from.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Rusk County, Texas, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Rusk County, Texas?

52,842 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Rusk County, Texas?

$68,658 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Longview, TX (89.5 against a national average of 100), that is $76,713 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at metro level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Rusk County, Texas?

4.4% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Rusk County, Texas?

$2.8B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).