ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Gillespie County, Texas

Fredericksburg, TX · Population 27,524
9 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$76,162 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
3.1% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$1.8B up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
37.2% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$76,162 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$48,971 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$116,131 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$78,437 state RPP 97.1
Poverty Rate
9.2% down from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Gillespie County$76,162
Texas$78,476
National$80,734
Gillespie County is $2,314 (2.9%) below the Texas median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Texas, 97.1 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the state index stands in for Gillespie County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 30.2% (8,301 residents) 55-64: 15.1% (4,156 residents) 35-54: 20.1% (5,545 residents) 18-34: 15.2% (4,172 residents) Under 18: 19.4% (5,350 residents) 51 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 19.4%
18-34 · 15.2%
35-54 · 20.1%
55-64 · 15.1%
65+ · 30.2%
Race & Ethnicity
White81.9%
Two or More Races11%
Some Other Race5.8%
American Indian and Alaska Native0.5%
Asian0.4%
Black or African American0.3%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0.2%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)22.9%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
90.1%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +0.5 pts vs national
37.2%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
up from national +1.5 pts vs national
13.9%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 0.2 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
27,524
Population
12,521
Labor Force
Employed
12,180
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
3.1% up from 2024 +0.1 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 4 min below national avg
21.9 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
11.4%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income near the national median: Median household income tracks the national median, indicating a broad-based consumer market.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $2,314 (2.9%) under the Texas median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
  • Aging population: Median age of 51 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$1.8B up from 2023 +2.9% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+2.9% real (inflation-adjusted) · +6% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
97.1
Cost of Living · state · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Gillespie County, Texas, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Accommodation and Food Services
2,173 21.1%
$31,157
2Retail Trade
1,824 17.7%
$40,265
3Health Care and Social Assistance
1,780 17.3%
$65,341
4Manufacturing
1,556 15.1%
$47,297
5Construction
1,126 10.9%
$65,109
6Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
455 4.4%
$83,164
7Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
380 3.7%
$47,161
8Finance and Insurance
378 3.7%
$97,383
9Wholesale Trade
364 3.5%
$56,514
10Other Services (except Public Administration)
266 2.6%
$49,122
Government employment · context only
1,279

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 11,297 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Accommodation and Food Services employs 2,173 workers (21.1% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $31,157. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 1,279 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $1.8B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Finance and Insurance averages $97,383 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $31,157, a 3.1x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing here.
Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
28.77x
801
Fishing, Hunting and Trapping
20.54x
13
Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar
5.76x
88
Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe, and Jewelry Retailers
2.41x
234
Accommodation
2.41x
393
Animal Production and Aquaculture
2.40x
55
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
1.99x
250
Food and Beverage Retailers
1.86x
511
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
1.75x
176
Food Services and Drinking Places
1.72x
1,780
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.63x
721
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
1.61x
468
Food Manufacturing
1.60x
241
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
1.59x
141
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
1.57x
55

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
15 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Accommodation & Food Services Cluster at 36.7% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
4,301
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
28.77x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail, Highest 10 By LQ
Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
28.77x 801
Fishing, Hunting and Trapping
20.54x 13
Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar
5.76x 88
Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe, and Jewelry Retailers
2.41x 234
Accommodation
2.41x 393
Animal Production and Aquaculture
2.40x 55
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
1.99x 250
Food and Beverage Retailers
1.86x 511
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
1.75x 176
Food Services and Drinking Places
1.72x 1,780
+ 5 more sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5, holding a further 1,626 jobs not counted in the total above. See the spider chart for the broader picture.

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.29x
Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
63 employed
0.42x
Educational Services
115 employed
0.48x
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods
139 employed
0.49x
Social Assistance
208 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in Texas costs 6.55¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). Texas has 20 rail-truck intermodal terminals, the nearest 73 miles from the county. Land area 1058 sq mi, larger than 81% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing concentrates at 28.77x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 15 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 38.1% of the employment across them, the largest being visitor economy. Demand reaches this base from more than one market rather than from a single one.
  • Attraction whitespace: 4 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5 with at least 50 employed, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Gillespie County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$460,700 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,340 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
74.9% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
19.9% up from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
3.5% available
for rent or sale
6.0x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Stretched
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$1,089/mo
1 Bedroom
$1,096/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,438/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,806/mo
4 Bedroom
$2,116/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,216/mo, from a renter median of $48,630) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 44% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 16.4% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Stretched market: Home value to income ratio of 6.0x is well above the ~4.1x national average; attainable workforce housing may be a recruitment friction.
  • High home ownership: 74.9% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 19.9% of housing units are vacant, above the Texas rate of 9.4%, and up from 18.9% in 2019.
  • Mostly second homes: seasonal, recreational and occasional-use units are 58.7% of vacant units, so the headline rate is not available supply.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 17.6% of the vacant stock, or 3.5% of all housing units against the 19.9% headline vacancy rate. That is the figure to plan an incoming employer's housing against, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 2 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $48,630 can pay without cost burden (~$1,216/mo), and 44% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
13,873 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 4 min below national avg
21.9 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
11.4%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
77.9%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 54.9%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 55% Participation
of population age 16 and over (22,825)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
37.2% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
90.1% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Gillespie County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Gillespie County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
30%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 15.1% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
39.6%
Service
17.7%
Sales & Office
24.7%
Construction / Maint.
12.1%
Production / Transport
5.8%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 40% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 12,180 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 30% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Low participation: 54.9% labor force participation. The labor force itself fell 1% between 2019 and 2024, from 12,646 to 12,523.
  • Short commutes: 21.9-minute mean commute is a quality-of-life and labor-access advantage worth surfacing for site selectors.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Gillespie County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Gillespie County shows strong potential for beverage and tobacco product manufacturing attraction, with a 28.77x concentration and 801 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 30% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The concentrated base spans beverage and tobacco product manufacturing, fishing, hunting and trapping, and museums, historical sites, and similar, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 38.1% of the employment across them, the largest being visitor economy. Supply-chain recruitment has more than one demand base to work from.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Gillespie County, Texas, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Gillespie County, Texas?

27,524 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Gillespie County, Texas?

$76,162 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Texas (97.1 against a national average of 100), that is $78,437 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at state level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Gillespie County, Texas?

3.1% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Gillespie County, Texas?

$1.8B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).