ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Clinton County, Missouri

Kansas City, MO-KS · Population 21,414
9 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$70,627 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
4.1% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$575M up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
22.1% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$70,627 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$35,789 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$89,325 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$76,354 metro RPP 92.5
Poverty Rate
12.3% up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Clinton County$70,627
Missouri$70,702
National$80,734
Clinton County is $75 (0.1%) below the Missouri median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Kansas City, MO-KS, 92.5 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the metro index stands in for Clinton County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 18.9% (4,049 residents) 55-64: 14.7% (3,158 residents) 35-54: 24.2% (5,174 residents) 18-34: 19% (4,070 residents) Under 18: 23.2% (4,963 residents) 42 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 23.2%
18-34 · 19%
35-54 · 24.2%
55-64 · 14.7%
65+ · 18.9%
Race & Ethnicity
White92.8%
Two or More Races5.2%
Some Other Race1%
Black or African American0.8%
Asian0.2%
American Indian and Alaska Native0.1%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)2.6%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
92.5%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +2.9 pts vs national
22.1%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
down from national 13.6 pts vs national
7.8%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 6.3 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
21,414
Population
10,320
Labor Force
Employed
10,013
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.1% up from 2024 +0.4 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 2 min above national avg
28.6 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
10%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $75 (0.1%) under the Missouri median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
  • Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 7.5% below the national average, so the nominal median of $70,627 is worth $76,354 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at metro level, not county level.
  • Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 13.6 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.
  • Aging population: Median age of 42 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$575M up from 2023 +6.5% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+6.5% real (inflation-adjusted) · +9.9% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
92.5
Cost of Living · metro · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2024 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below · 2025 is available but itemises 7 of the broad sectors against 8 for 2024, so the fuller year is shown
Top private-sector industries by employment in Clinton County, Missouri, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Health Care and Social Assistance
1,077 35.5%
$56,123
2Construction
367 12.1%
$71,411
3Retail Trade
357 11.8%
$31,777
4Accommodation and Food Services
354 11.7%
$19,993
5Manufacturing
260 8.6%
$47,042
6Finance and Insurance
163 5.4%
$58,509
7Administrative and Support and Waste Management
151 5.0%
$42,098
8Other Services (except Public Administration)
119 3.9%
$34,610
9Transportation and Warehousing
100 3.3%
$54,963
10Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
87 2.9%
$51,976
Government employment · context only
1,056

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 3,399 private jobs in 2024: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Health Care and Social Assistance employs 1,077 workers (35.5% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $56,123. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 1,056 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $575M (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Construction averages $71,411 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $19,993, a 3.6x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Wood Product Manufacturing here.
Wood Product Manufacturing
8.90x
94
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
5.55x
149
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
4.72x
401
Crop Production
3.17x
44
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
2.93x
86
Animal Production and Aquaculture
2.48x
17
Food Manufacturing
2.12x
96
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.70x
224
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
1.64x
108
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.60x
76

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
10 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Health Care & Social Assistance Cluster at 31% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
1,295
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
8.90x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail
Wood Product Manufacturing
8.90x 94
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
5.55x 149
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
4.72x 401
Crop Production
3.17x 44
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
2.93x 86
Animal Production and Aquaculture
2.48x 17
Food Manufacturing
2.12x 96
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.70x 224
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
1.64x 108
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.60x 76
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Wood Product Manufacturing concentrates at 8.90x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 10 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 31% of the employment across them, the largest being health care economy. Demand reaches this base from more than one market rather than from a single one.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Clinton County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2024 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$226,800 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,008 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
75.7% down from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
8.2% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
1.7% available
for rent or sale
3.2x
Home Value to Income Ratio
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$1,095/mo
1 Bedroom
$1,197/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,358/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,769/mo
4 Bedroom
$2,103/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,180/mo, from a renter median of $47,192) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 29.2% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 14.8% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • In line with national: Home value to income ratio of 3.2x sits near the ~4.1x national average; affordability is neither a clear advantage nor a recruitment friction.
  • High home ownership: 75.7% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 1 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $47,192 can pay without cost burden (~$1,180/mo), and 29.2% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
12,402 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 2 min above national avg
28.6 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
10%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
83.6%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 60.5%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 60% Participation
of population age 16 and over (17,060)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
22.1% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
92.5% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Clinton County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Clinton County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
25.5%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 14.7% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
32.8%
Service
14.9%
Sales & Office
20.5%
Construction / Maint.
10.5%
Production / Transport
21.4%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 40% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 10,013 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 25.5% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Healthy participation: 60.5% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Clinton County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Clinton County shows strong potential for wood product manufacturing attraction, with a 8.90x concentration and 94 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 25.5% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The concentrated base spans wood product manufacturing, gasoline stations and fuel dealers, and nursing and residential care facilities, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 31% of the employment across them, the largest being health care economy. Supply-chain recruitment has more than one demand base to work from.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2024 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Clinton County, Missouri, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Clinton County, Missouri?

21,414 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Clinton County, Missouri?

$70,627 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Kansas City, MO-KS (92.5 against a national average of 100), that is $76,354 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at metro level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Clinton County, Missouri?

4.1% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Clinton County, Missouri?

$575M (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).