Lewis County, Idaho

• Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
• Below the state median: Median household income runs $26,185 (33.7%) under the Idaho median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
• Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 4.5% below the national average, so the nominal median of $51,615 is worth $54,047 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at state level, not county level.
• Elevated poverty: At 15.3%, the rate is in economically distressed territory and supports federal funding narratives (CDFI, NMTC, EDA).
• Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 14.4 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.
• Aging population: Median age of 49 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

• Largest private-sector industry: Retail Trade employs 225 workers (27.3% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $34,159. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 433 and is counted separately.
• Economic scale: Regional GDP of $223M (2024).
• Wage stratification: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services averages $90,218 while Health Care and Social Assistance averages $26,290, a 3.4x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.

• Top specialization: Forestry and Logging concentrates at 134.85x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
• Cluster depth: 4 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, but 54% of the employment across them depends on one source of demand: resident household spending. Read the count as depth within that single demand base rather than as spread across separate ones.

• In line with national: Home value to income ratio of 4.4x sits near the ~4.1x national average; affordability is neither a clear advantage nor a recruitment friction.
• High home ownership: 76.4% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
• Elevated vacancy: 13.8% of housing units are vacant, above the Idaho rate of 10.3%, and down from 15.5% in 2019.
• Mostly second homes: seasonal, recreational and occasional-use units are 28.6% of vacant units, so the headline rate is not available supply.
• Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 17.1% of the vacant stock, or 2.4% of all housing units against the 13.8% headline vacancy rate. Absorbable supply for an incoming employer is thin, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
• Affordable rent tiers: 3 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $44,688 can pay without cost burden (~$1,117/mo), and 26.1% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.

• Succession risk is real: 31.9% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
• Low participation: 47.6% labor force participation. The labor force itself fell 9.2% between 2019 and 2024, from 1,546 to 1,404.
• Short commutes: 21.4-minute mean commute is a quality-of-life and labor-access advantage worth surfacing for site selectors.
• Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Lewis County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.

Lewis County shows strong potential for forestry and logging attraction, with a 134.85x concentration and 52 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 31.9% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

Most of the employment across the concentrated sub-sectors traces back to a single source of demand. Resident household spending accounts for 54% of it, with food and beverage retailers the largest single sub-sector at 42.3%. Recruitment that widens the demand base changes that exposure; recruitment inside the same base deepens it.