ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Grand County, Utah

Population 9,754
9 Sources Updated August 12, 2026
$67,106 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
4.4% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$939M down from the baseline named below
GDP real, vs 2023
37.5% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national
Small population: 9,754 residents. These figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates, which carry a wide margin of error for places under 20,000 people. Read each value as an approximate range, and treat year-over-year changes as indicative rather than exact. A small shift can reflect survey sampling, not a real change on the ground.

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$67,106 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$42,062 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$90,104 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$67,852 state RPP 98.9
Poverty Rate
13.3% up from 2019 vs 2019approx.
Median Income Comparison
Grand County$67,106
Utah$95,166
National$80,734
Grand County is $28,060 (29.5%) below the Utah median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Utah, 98.9 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the state index stands in for Grand County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 20.1% (1,958 residents) 55-64: 12.2% (1,192 residents) 35-54: 25.5% (2,492 residents) 18-34: 22.8% (2,228 residents) Under 18: 19.3% (1,884 residents) 41 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 19.3%
18-34 · 22.8%
35-54 · 25.5%
55-64 · 12.2%
65+ · 20.1%
Race & Ethnicity
White83.8%
Two or More Races5.6%
Some Other Race3.9%
American Indian and Alaska Native3.2%
Asian2.2%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander1.3%
Black or African American0%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)13%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
94.7%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +5.1 pts vs national
37.5%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
up from national +1.8 pts vs national
12.5%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 1.6 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
9,754
Population
5,484
Labor Force
Employed
5,396
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.4% up from 2024 +0.4 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 12 min below national avg
14.7 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
9%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $28,060 (29.5%) under the Utah median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$939M down from 2023 -1.5% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
-1.5% real (inflation-adjusted) · +1.2% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
98.9
Cost of Living · state · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2024 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below · 2025 is available but itemises 8 of the broad sectors against 10 for 2024, so the fuller year is shown
Top private-sector industries by employment in Grand County, Utah, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Accommodation and Food Services
2,301 44.4%
$35,768
2Retail Trade
822 15.9%
$38,987
3Health Care and Social Assistance
537 10.4%
$65,292
4Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
396 7.6%
$31,129
5Construction
320 6.2%
$53,009
6Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
269 5.2%
$68,461
7Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
164 3.2%
$35,178
8Transportation and Warehousing
148 2.9%
$46,143
9Wholesale Trade
121 2.3%
$47,635
10Manufacturing
107 2.1%
$63,127
Government employment · context only
1,135

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 5,799 private jobs in 2024: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Accommodation and Food Services employs 2,301 workers (44.4% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $35,768. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 1,135 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $939M (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services averages $68,461 while Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation averages $31,129, a 2.2x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation here.
Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation
22.46x
30
Accommodation
12.35x
1,033
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
4.56x
370
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
3.96x
260
Food Services and Drinking Places
2.38x
1,268
Rental and Leasing Services
2.20x
55
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
1.66x
76
Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
1.51x
36

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
8 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Accommodation & Food Services Cluster at 73.6% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
3,128
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
22.46x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail
Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation
22.46x 30
Accommodation
12.35x 1,033
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
4.56x 370
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
3.96x 260
Food Services and Drinking Places
2.38x 1,268
Rental and Leasing Services
2.20x 55
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
1.66x 76
Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
1.51x 36

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.35x
Ambulatory Health Care Services
135 employed
0.39x
Social Assistance
79 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in Utah costs 8.43¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). Utah has 1 rail-truck intermodal terminal, the nearest 178 miles from the county. Land area 3673 sq mi, larger than 96% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation concentrates at 22.46x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 8 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, but 86.3% of the employment across them depends on one source of demand: visitor economy. Read the count as depth within that single demand base rather than as spread across separate ones.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Grand County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2024 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$538,700 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,118 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
70.3% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
16% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
5.3% available
for rent or sale
8.0x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Stretched
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$1,143/mo
1 Bedroom
$1,303/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,564/mo
3 Bedroom
$2,128/mo
4 Bedroom
$2,624/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,317/mo, from a renter median of $52,697) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 38.4% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 26.3% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Stretched market: Home value to income ratio of 8.0x is well above the ~4.1x national average; attainable workforce housing may be a recruitment friction.
  • High home ownership: 70.3% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 16% of housing units are vacant, above the Utah rate of 8.1%, and down from 23% in 2019.
  • Mostly second homes: seasonal, recreational and occasional-use units are 45.3% of vacant units, so the headline rate is not available supply.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 33.3% of the vacant stock, or 5.3% of all housing units against the 16% headline vacancy rate. That is the figure to plan an incoming employer's housing against, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 2 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $52,697 can pay without cost burden (~$1,317/mo), and 38.4% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
5,912 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 12 min below national avg
14.7 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
9%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
91%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 67.7%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 68% Participation
of population age 16 and over (8,095)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
37.5% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
94.7% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Grand County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Grand County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
20.2%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 12.2% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
41.6%
Service
19%
Sales & Office
23.1%
Construction / Maint.
9.7%
Production / Transport
6.5%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 60% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 5,396 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Healthy participation: 67.7% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Short commutes: 14.7-minute mean commute is a quality-of-life and labor-access advantage worth surfacing for site selectors.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Grand County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Grand County shows strong potential for scenic and sightseeing transportation attraction, with a 22.46x concentration and 30 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally.

Most of the employment across the concentrated sub-sectors traces back to a single source of demand. Visitor economy accounts for 86.3% of it, with food services and drinking places the largest single sub-sector at 40.5%. Recruitment that widens the demand base changes that exposure; recruitment inside the same base deepens it.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2024 annual
BLS LAUS (via FRED)2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Grand County, Utah, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Grand County, Utah?

9,754 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Grand County, Utah?

$67,106 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Utah (98.9 against a national average of 100), that is $67,852 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at state level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Grand County, Utah?

4.4% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Grand County, Utah?

$939M (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).