ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Grant County, South Dakota

Population 7,563
9 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$75,028 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
3.2% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$831M up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
25.3% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national
Small population: 7,563 residents. These figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates, which carry a wide margin of error for places under 20,000 people. Read each value as an approximate range, and treat year-over-year changes as indicative rather than exact. A small shift can reflect survey sampling, not a real change on the ground.

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$75,028 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$37,694 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$88,634 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$84,682 state RPP 88.6
Poverty Rate
11.6% up from 2019 vs 2019approx.
Median Income Comparison
Grant County$75,028
South Dakota$75,081
National$80,734
Grant County is $53 (0.1%) below the South Dakota median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for South Dakota, 88.6 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the state index stands in for Grant County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 23.4% (1,767 residents) 55-64: 14.8% (1,123 residents) 35-54: 21.5% (1,627 residents) 18-34: 18.1% (1,369 residents) Under 18: 22.2% (1,677 residents) 44 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 22.2%
18-34 · 18.1%
35-54 · 21.5%
55-64 · 14.8%
65+ · 23.4%
Race & Ethnicity
White90.7%
Two or More Races2.9%
American Indian and Alaska Native2.7%
Some Other Race2.5%
Asian0.8%
Black or African American0.4%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)7.4%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
91.6%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +2.0 pts vs national
25.3%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
down from national 10.4 pts vs national
7.3%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 6.8 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
7,563
Population
4,227
Labor Force
Employed
4,111
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
3.2% up from 2024 +0.7 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 13 min below national avg
13.7 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
11%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $53 (0.1%) under the South Dakota median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
  • Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 11.4% below the national average, so the nominal median of $75,028 is worth $84,682 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at state level, not county level.
  • Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 10.4 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.
  • Aging population: Median age of 44 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$831M up from 2023 +14.1% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+14.1% real (inflation-adjusted) · +12.8% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
88.6
Cost of Living · state · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2024 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below · 2025 is available but itemises 6 of the broad sectors against 8 for 2024, so the fuller year is shown
Top private-sector industries by employment in Grant County, South Dakota, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Manufacturing
738 29.0%
$73,347
2Retail Trade
430 16.9%
$38,855
3Wholesale Trade
280 11.0%
$70,001
4Construction
274 10.8%
$63,890
5Accommodation and Food Services
228 9.0%
$15,356
6Finance and Insurance
144 5.7%
$70,534
7Utilities
142 5.6%
$103,803
8Administrative and Support and Waste Management
134 5.3%
$59,420
9Other Services (except Public Administration)
109 4.3%
$36,733
10Transportation and Warehousing
65 2.6%
$60,146
Government employment · context only
432

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 3,422 private jobs in 2024: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Manufacturing employs 738 workers (29% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $73,347. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 432 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $831M (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Utilities averages $103,803 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $15,356, a 6.8x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Animal Production and Aquaculture here.
Animal Production and Aquaculture
26.39x
182
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
12.85x
138
Utilities
9.33x
142
Crop Production
4.43x
62
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
2.88x
152
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.63x
71
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
2.26x
193
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods
2.02x
178
Repair and Maintenance
1.81x
68
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.80x
240
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
1.59x
57

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
11 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Retail Trade Cluster at 18.9% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
1,426
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
26.39x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail, Highest 10 By LQ
Animal Production and Aquaculture
26.39x 182
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
12.85x 138
Utilities
9.33x 142
Crop Production
4.43x 62
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
2.88x 152
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.63x 71
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
2.26x 193
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods
2.02x 178
Repair and Maintenance
1.81x 68
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.80x 240
+ 1 more sub-sector at LQ ≥ 1.5, holding a further 57 jobs not counted in the total above. See the spider chart for the broader picture.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Animal Production and Aquaculture concentrates at 26.39x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 11 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 23.5% of the employment across them, the largest being resident household spending. Demand reaches this base from more than one market rather than from a single one.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Grant County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2024 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$171,000 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$763 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
75.6% down from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
12.4% up from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
0.2% available
for rent or sale
2.3x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Affordable
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$641/mo
1 Bedroom
$708/mo
2 Bedroom
$929/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,292/mo
4 Bedroom
$1,438/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,190/mo, from a renter median of $47,596) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 24.5% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 11.9% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Affordable market: Home value to income ratio of 2.3x is well below the ~4.1x national average; supports talent attraction and family settlement narratives.
  • High home ownership: 75.6% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 12.4% of housing units are vacant, above the South Dakota rate of 10.5%, and up from 10.7% in 2019.
  • Vacancy composition: the largest vacancy category is other vacant at 85.7% of vacant units, with seasonal and recreational use at 11%.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 1.6% of the vacant stock, or 0.2% of all housing units against the 12.4% headline vacancy rate. Absorbable supply for an incoming employer is thin, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 3 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $47,596 can pay without cost burden (~$1,190/mo), and 24.5% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
4,119 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 13 min below national avg
13.7 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
11%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
88%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 69.1%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 69% Participation
of population age 16 and over (6,120)
up from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
25.3% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
91.6% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Grant County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Grant County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
27.3%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 14.8% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
33.7%
Service
20%
Sales & Office
15.7%
Construction / Maint.
14.7%
Production / Transport
15.8%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 40% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 4,111 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 27.3% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Healthy participation: 69.1% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Short commutes: 13.7-minute mean commute is a quality-of-life and labor-access advantage worth surfacing for site selectors.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Grant County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Grant County shows strong potential for animal production and aquaculture attraction, with a 26.39x concentration and 182 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 27.3% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The concentrated base spans animal production and aquaculture, nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing, and utilities, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 23.5% of the employment across them, the largest being resident household spending. Supply-chain recruitment has more than one demand base to work from.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2024 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Grant County, South Dakota, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Grant County, South Dakota?

7,563 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Grant County, South Dakota?

$75,028 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for South Dakota (88.6 against a national average of 100), that is $84,682 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at state level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Grant County, South Dakota?

3.2% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Grant County, South Dakota?

$831M (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).