ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Codington County, South Dakota

Watertown, SD · Population 28,767
10 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$72,727 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
2% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$2.1B up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
21.4% down from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$72,727 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$39,825 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$90,805 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$82,085 state RPP 88.6
Poverty Rate
8.8% down from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Codington County$72,727
South Dakota$75,081
National$80,734
Codington County is $2,354 (3.1%) below the South Dakota median.
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for South Dakota, 88.6 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the state index stands in for Codington County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 19.6% (5,625 residents) 55-64: 13.2% (3,794 residents) 35-54: 23.6% (6,775 residents) 18-34: 20.7% (5,961 residents) Under 18: 23% (6,612 residents) 40 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 23%
18-34 · 20.7%
35-54 · 23.6%
55-64 · 13.2%
65+ · 19.6%
Race & Ethnicity
White90.5%
Two or More Races4.6%
American Indian and Alaska Native1.9%
Some Other Race1.4%
Black or African American1.1%
Asian0.6%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)3.3%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
93.9%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +4.3 pts vs national
21.4%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
down from national 14.3 pts vs national
5.7%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 8.4 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
28,767
Population
15,710
Labor Force
Employed
15,409
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
2% up from 2024 +0.3 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 12 min below national avg
14.1 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.6%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Below the state median: Median household income runs $2,354 (3.1%) under the South Dakota median, so statewide income averages overstate local household buying power.
  • Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 11.4% below the national average, so the nominal median of $72,727 is worth $82,085 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at state level, not county level.
  • Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 14.3 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$2.1B up from 2023 +1.5% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+1.5% real (inflation-adjusted) · +3.2% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
88.6
Cost of Living · state · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Codington County, South Dakota, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Manufacturing
3,275 24.2%
$63,808
2Retail Trade
2,579 19.1%
$38,049
3Health Care and Social Assistance
2,037 15.1%
$65,433
4Accommodation and Food Services
1,579 11.7%
$20,602
5Construction
1,033 7.6%
$66,276
6Wholesale Trade
949 7.0%
$72,056
7Finance and Insurance
668 4.9%
$80,608
8Transportation and Warehousing
523 3.9%
$51,329
9Other Services (except Public Administration)
485 3.6%
$40,749
10Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
396 2.9%
$75,296
Government employment · context only
2,349

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 14,839 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Manufacturing employs 3,275 workers (24.2% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $63,808. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 2,349 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $2.1B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Finance and Insurance averages $80,608 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $20,602, a 3.9x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Machinery Manufacturing here.
Machinery Manufacturing
8.54x
1,035
Animal Production and Aquaculture
5.47x
165
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
3.11x
602
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
2.90x
461
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.61x
305
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
2.51x
196
Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
2.43x
270
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.36x
361
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
1.90x
434
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
1.84x
304
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods
1.72x
653
Repair and Maintenance
1.64x
267
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
1.51x
432

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
13 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Manufacturing Cluster at 46.7% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
4,133
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
8.54x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail, Highest 10 By LQ
Machinery Manufacturing
8.54x 1,035
Animal Production and Aquaculture
5.47x 165
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
3.11x 602
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
2.90x 461
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.61x 305
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
2.51x 196
Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
2.43x 270
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.36x 361
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
1.90x 434
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
1.84x 304
+ 3 more sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5, holding a further 1,352 jobs not counted in the total above. See the spider chart for the broader picture.

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.23x
Educational Services
84 employed
0.32x
Administrative and Support Services
299 employed
0.33x
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
396 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in South Dakota costs 8.68¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). South Dakota has 0 rail-truck intermodal terminals. Land area 688 sq mi, larger than 58% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Machinery Manufacturing concentrates at 8.54x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 13 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 46.7% of the employment across them, the largest being goods manufacturing. Demand reaches this base from more than one market rather than from a single one.
  • Attraction whitespace: 3 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5 with at least 50 employed, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Codington County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$237,700 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$938 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
69.8% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
7.4% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
1.8% available
for rent or sale
3.3x
Home Value to Income Ratio
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$747/mo
1 Bedroom
$825/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,083/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,319/mo
4 Bedroom
$1,605/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,143/mo, from a renter median of $45,702) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 34% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 16.9% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • In line with national: Home value to income ratio of 3.3x sits near the ~4.1x national average; affordability is neither a clear advantage nor a recruitment friction.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 3 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $45,702 can pay without cost burden (~$1,143/mo), and 34% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
16,530 down from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 12 min below national avg
14.1 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.6%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
89.5%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 68.2%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 68% Participation
of population age 16 and over (23,073)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · College Scorecard
Bachelor's+
21.4% down from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
93.9% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Codington County
1 institution in Codington County reporting credentials to College Scorecard
Credentials awarded in Codington County
793/yr
Lake Area Technical College 793/yr

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
23%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 13.2% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
31.5%
Service
14.7%
Sales & Office
24.3%
Construction / Maint.
10.9%
Production / Transport
18.6%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 40% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 15,409 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 23% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Healthy participation: 68.2% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Short commutes: 14.1-minute mean commute is a quality-of-life and labor-access advantage worth surfacing for site selectors.
  • Talent pipeline: 1 institution in Codington County awards 793 credentials a year. Employers drawing from a wider labor shed should read this alongside institutions outside the county, which this page does not aggregate.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 10 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Codington County shows strong potential for machinery manufacturing attraction, with a 8.54x concentration and 1,035 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 23% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The concentrated base spans machinery manufacturing, animal production and aquaculture, and transportation equipment manufacturing, and no single source of demand accounts for more than 46.7% of the employment across them, the largest being goods manufacturing. Supply-chain recruitment has more than one demand base to work from.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026
College ScorecardAY 2022-23

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Codington County, South Dakota, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Codington County, South Dakota?

28,767 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Codington County, South Dakota?

$72,727 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for South Dakota (88.6 against a national average of 100), that is $82,085 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at state level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Codington County, South Dakota?

2% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Codington County, South Dakota?

$2.1B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).