ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Lamar County, Mississippi

Hattiesburg, MS · Population 65,713
9 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$70,909 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
3.3% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$2.8B up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
34.5% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$70,909 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$39,058 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$96,987 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$80,946 metro RPP 87.6
Poverty Rate
14.7% down from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Lamar County$70,909
Mississippi$56,447
National$80,734
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Hattiesburg, MS, 87.6 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the metro index stands in for Lamar County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 15.3% (10,062 residents) 55-64: 11.6% (7,623 residents) 35-54: 26.7% (17,544 residents) 18-34: 22.1% (14,509 residents) Under 18: 24.3% (15,975 residents) 38 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 24.3%
18-34 · 22.1%
35-54 · 26.7%
55-64 · 11.6%
65+ · 15.3%
Race & Ethnicity
White71.2%
Black or African American21.8%
Two or More Races3.9%
Some Other Race2%
Asian0.9%
American Indian and Alaska Native0.2%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)3.7%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
92%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +2.4 pts vs national
34.5%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
down from national 1.2 pts vs national
13%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 1.1 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
65,713
Population
32,847
Labor Force
Employed
31,262
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
3.3% up from 2024 +0.5 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute
26.0 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.4%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Cost of living stretches income further: Local prices run 12.4% below the national average, so the nominal median of $70,909 is worth $80,946 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at metro level, not county level.
  • Elevated poverty: At 14.7%, the rate is in economically distressed territory and supports federal funding narratives (CDFI, NMTC, EDA).

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$2.8B up from 2023 +3.3% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+3.3% real (inflation-adjusted) · +4.7% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
87.6
Cost of Living · metro · Below Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Lamar County, Mississippi, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Retail Trade
5,150 30.6%
$34,006
2Health Care and Social Assistance
3,521 20.9%
$53,317
3Accommodation and Food Services
3,266 19.4%
$21,454
4Finance and Insurance
1,035 6.1%
$76,162
5Administrative and Support and Waste Management
977 5.8%
$38,853
6Construction
913 5.4%
$60,551
7Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
665 3.9%
$67,037
8Manufacturing
464 2.8%
$73,728
9Other Services (except Public Administration)
436 2.6%
$42,430
10Transportation and Warehousing
422 2.5%
$65,189
Government employment · context only
2,342

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 18,622 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Retail Trade employs 5,150 workers (30.6% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $34,006. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 2,342 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $2.8B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Finance and Insurance averages $76,162 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $21,454, a 3.6x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Forestry and Logging here.
Forestry and Logging
9.21x
59
Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe, and Jewelry Retailers
5.05x
808
Wood Product Manufacturing
4.66x
262
Health and Personal Care Retailers
2.82x
417
General Merchandise Retailers
2.75x
1,245
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.70x
517
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.49x
365
Furniture, Home Furnishings, and Other Retailers
2.45x
263
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
2.37x
491
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
2.28x
817
Utilities
2.00x
168
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
1.92x
548
Food Services and Drinking Places
1.72x
2,937

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
13 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Retail Trade Cluster at 52.3% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
5,244
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
9.21x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail, Highest 10 By LQ
Forestry and Logging
9.21x 59
Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe, and Jewelry Retailers
5.05x 808
Wood Product Manufacturing
4.66x 262
Health and Personal Care Retailers
2.82x 417
General Merchandise Retailers
2.75x 1,245
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.70x 517
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
2.49x 365
Furniture, Home Furnishings, and Other Retailers
2.45x 263
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Misc. Retailers
2.37x 491
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
2.28x 817
+ 3 more sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5, holding a further 3,653 jobs not counted in the total above. See the spider chart for the broader picture.

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.32x
Educational Services
144 employed
0.36x
Couriers and Messengers
57 employed
0.42x
Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
152 employed
0.43x
Securities, Commodity Contracts, Investments
66 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in Mississippi costs 7.38¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). Mississippi has 6 rail-truck intermodal terminals, the nearest 63 miles from the county. Land area 497 sq mi, larger than 35% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Forestry and Logging concentrates at 9.21x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 13 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, but 52.3% of the employment across them depends on one source of demand: resident household spending. Read the count as depth within that single demand base rather than as spread across separate ones.
  • Attraction whitespace: 4 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5 with at least 50 employed, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Lamar County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$224,700 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,126 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
69.5% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
8.3% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
2.3% available
for rent or sale
3.2x
Home Value to Income Ratio
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$766/mo
1 Bedroom
$888/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,047/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,348/mo
4 Bedroom
$1,386/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,256/mo, from a renter median of $50,239) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 39.1% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 12.1% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • In line with national: Home value to income ratio of 3.2x sits near the ~4.1x national average; affordability is neither a clear advantage nor a recruitment friction.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 3 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $50,239 can pay without cost burden (~$1,256/mo), and 39.1% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
39,676 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute
26.0 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.4%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
79.7%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 64.2%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 64% Participation
of population age 16 and over (51,799)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003
Bachelor's+
34.5% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
92% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Lamar County
The IPEDS institutional directory lists no college, university, or technical school located in Lamar County. Any training pipeline serving this county runs through institutions outside it, which this page does not aggregate.

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
19.2%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 11.6% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
42.9%
Service
14.8%
Sales & Office
19.1%
Construction / Maint.
8%
Production / Transport
15%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 60% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 31,262 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Healthy participation: 64.2% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Talent pipeline: no college, university, or technical school is located in Lamar County per the IPEDS institutional directory, so any training pipeline serving it runs through institutions outside the county.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 9 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Lamar County shows strong potential for forestry and logging attraction, with a 9.21x concentration and 59 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally.

Most of the employment across the concentrated sub-sectors traces back to a single source of demand. Resident household spending accounts for 52.3% of it, with food services and drinking places the largest single sub-sector at 33%. Recruitment that widens the demand base changes that exposure; recruitment inside the same base deepens it.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Lamar County, Mississippi, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Lamar County, Mississippi?

65,713 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Lamar County, Mississippi?

$70,909 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Hattiesburg, MS (87.6 against a national average of 100), that is $80,946 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at metro level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Lamar County, Mississippi?

3.3% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Lamar County, Mississippi?

$2.8B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).