ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Placer County, California

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA · Population 419,156
10 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$115,998 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
4.3% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$34.3B up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
43.2% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$115,998 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$57,862 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$150,239 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$108,714 metro RPP 106.7
Poverty Rate
6.8% down from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Placer County$115,998
California$99,122
National$80,734
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA, 106.7 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the metro index stands in for Placer County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.
Based on available federal declaration records, this 2020-2024 window includes a federally declared fire in 2021; a few measures here may reflect that and are best read with it in mind.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 20.5% (85,822 residents) 55-64: 12.9% (54,260 residents) 35-54: 26.8% (112,309 residents) 18-34: 18% (75,478 residents) Under 18: 21.8% (91,287 residents) 42 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 21.8%
18-34 · 18%
35-54 · 26.8%
55-64 · 12.9%
65+ · 20.5%
Race & Ethnicity
White69.1%
Two or More Races14.4%
Asian9.2%
Some Other Race5%
Black or African American1.7%
American Indian and Alaska Native0.5%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0.2%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)15.7%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
95.1%
High School+
National: 89.6%
up from national +5.5 pts vs national
43.2%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
up from national +7.5 pts vs national
15.2%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
up from national +1.1 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
419,156
Population
206,228
Labor Force
Employed
196,337
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.3% up from 2024 +0.2 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 1 min above national avg
27.4 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
22.7%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income premium: Households earn well above the national median, supporting strong retail and housing markets.
  • Cost of living erodes income: Local prices run 6.7% above the national average, so the nominal median of $115,998 is worth $108,714 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at metro level, not county level.
  • Talent advantage: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment exceeds the national average by 7.5 pts, supports knowledge-economy and tech attraction.
  • Aging population: Median age of 42 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$34.3B up from 2023 +2.3% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+2.3% real (inflation-adjusted) · +5.2% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
106.7
Cost of Living · metro · Above Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Placer County, California, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Health Care and Social Assistance
35,909 24.8%
$93,347
2Retail Trade
22,224 15.3%
$47,941
3Accommodation and Food Services
19,839 13.7%
$33,020
4Construction
18,848 13.0%
$91,175
5Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
12,422 8.6%
$93,817
6Administrative and Support and Waste Management
9,114 6.3%
$61,430
7Other Services (except Public Administration)
7,679 5.3%
$54,099
8Manufacturing
7,139 4.9%
$80,930
9Finance and Insurance
6,601 4.5%
$134,052
10Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
5,304 3.7%
$94,228
Government employment · context only
22,287

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 165,925 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Health Care and Social Assistance employs 35,909 workers (24.8% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $93,347. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 22,287 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $34.3B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Finance and Insurance averages $134,052 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $33,020, a 4.1x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Construction of Buildings here.
Construction of Buildings
2.12x
4,906
Utilities
2.10x
1,573
Real Estate
1.97x
4,455
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.93x
4,599
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.86x
12,091
Miscellaneous Manufacturing
1.85x
1,404
Repair and Maintenance
1.83x
3,326
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
1.53x
3,902

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
8 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Construction Cluster at 46.9% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
36,256
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
2.12x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail
Construction of Buildings
2.12x 4,906
Utilities
2.10x 1,573
Real Estate
1.97x 4,455
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.93x 4,599
Specialty Trade Contractors
1.86x 12,091
Miscellaneous Manufacturing
1.85x 1,404
Repair and Maintenance
1.83x 3,326
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
1.53x 3,902

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.08x
Warehousing and Storage
185 employed
0.09x
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
82 employed
Energy-intensive sector in a state where industrial electricity costs 2.51x the national average.
0.15x
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
332 employed
0.16x
Printing and Related Support Activities
68 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base; 2 further sub-sectors met the LQ test but conflict with a measured local constraint and are not listed. Industrial electricity in California costs 21.62¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). California has 30 rail-truck intermodal terminals, the nearest 84 miles from the county. Land area 1407 sq mi, larger than 87% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Construction of Buildings concentrates at 2.12x the national norm.
  • Cluster depth: 8 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, but 59.2% of the employment across them depends on one source of demand: construction and real estate cycle. Read the count as depth within that single demand base rather than as spread across separate ones.
  • Attraction whitespace: 4 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5 with at least 50 employed and clear the local siting screen on energy cost, freight access and land base, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Placer County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$688,100 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$2,069 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
74.8% up from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
11.9% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
1.7% available
for rent or sale
5.9x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Stretched
vs. ~4.1x national average
Based on available federal declaration records, this 2020-2024 window includes a federally declared fire in 2021; a few measures here may reflect that and are best read with it in mind.

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$1,748/mo
1 Bedroom
$1,832/mo
2 Bedroom
$2,255/mo
3 Bedroom
$3,002/mo
4 Bedroom
$3,460/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$1,757/mo, from a renter median of $70,278) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 54.8% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 28.2% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Stretched market: Home value to income ratio of 5.9x is well above the ~4.1x national average; attainable workforce housing may be a recruitment friction.
  • High home ownership: 74.8% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 11.9% of housing units are vacant, above the California rate of 7.5%, and down from 13% in 2019.
  • Mostly second homes: seasonal, recreational and occasional-use units are 72.1% of vacant units, so the headline rate is not available supply.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 14.2% of the vacant stock, or 1.7% of all housing units against the 11.9% headline vacancy rate. Absorbable supply for an incoming employer is thin, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Affordable rent tiers: 1 of 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $70,278 can pay without cost burden (~$1,757/mo), and 54.8% of renter households are measured as cost-burdened.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
242,047 up from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 1 min above national avg
27.4 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
22.7%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
81.8%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 61.2%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 61% Participation
of population age 16 and over (338,996)
up from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · College Scorecard
Bachelor's+
43.2% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
95.1% up from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Placer County
4 institutions in Placer County reporting credentials to College Scorecard
Credentials awarded in Placer County
5,561/yr
Sierra College 4,995/yr
William Jessup University 444/yr
Hoss Lee Academy 106/yr
Medical Career College of Northern California 16/yr

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
22.4%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 12.9% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
50.2%
Service
15.1%
Sales & Office
21.4%
Construction / Maint.
6.4%
Production / Transport
6.9%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 60% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 196,337 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 22.4% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Healthy participation: 61.2% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Talent pipeline: 4 institutions in Placer County award 5,561 credentials a year. Employers drawing from a wider labor shed should read this alongside institutions outside the county, which this page does not aggregate.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 10 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Placer County shows emerging potential for construction of buildings attraction, with a 2.12x concentration and 4,906 jobs in this sub-sector. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 22.4% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

Most of the employment across the concentrated sub-sectors traces back to a single source of demand. Construction and real estate cycle accounts for 59.2% of it, with specialty trade contractors the largest single sub-sector at 33.3%. Recruitment that widens the demand base changes that exposure; recruitment inside the same base deepens it.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026
College ScorecardAY 2022-23

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Placer County, California, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Placer County, California?

419,156 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Placer County, California?

$115,998 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA (106.7 against a national average of 100), that is $108,714 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at metro level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Placer County, California?

4.3% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Placer County, California?

$34.3B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).