ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Napa County, California

Napa, CA · Population 134,869
10 Sources Updated September 10, 2026
$111,471 up from the baseline named below
Median Income (nominal) vs 2019
$80,734 national
4.3% up from the baseline named below
Unemployment vs 2024
4.3% national
$14.6B up from the baseline named below
GDP (nominal) real change vs 2023
39.8% up from the baseline named below
Bachelor's+ vs 2019
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household (nominal)
$111,471 up from 2019 vs 2019
Per Capita
$61,040 up from 2019 vs 2019
Mean Household
$161,672 up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Household (cost-of-living adjusted)
$98,997 metro RPP 112.6
Poverty Rate
8.5% up from 2019 vs 2019
Median Income Comparison
Napa County$111,471
California$99,122
National$80,734
Cost-of-living adjustment uses the BEA all-items regional price parity for Napa, CA, 112.6 against a national average of 100 (2024). BEA publishes regional price parity at state and metropolitan level only; there is no county figure, so the metro index stands in for Napa County and the adjusted median is an approximation. Per capita and mean household income above are nominal and carry no adjustment.
Based on available federal declaration records, this 2020-2024 window includes a federally declared fire in 2020; a few measures here may reflect that and are best read with it in mind.

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 21.1% (28,455 residents) 55-64: 13.4% (18,109 residents) 35-54: 25.7% (34,719 residents) 18-34: 20.3% (27,360 residents) Under 18: 19.4% (26,226 residents) 43 Median Age
CohortsShare of total population
Under 18 · 19.4%
18-34 · 20.3%
35-54 · 25.7%
55-64 · 13.4%
65+ · 21.1%
Race & Ethnicity
White55.6%
Two or More Races16.4%
Some Other Race16.3%
Asian8.2%
Black or African American2%
American Indian and Alaska Native1.1%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0.4%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)36.4%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
85.1%
High School+
National: 89.6%
down from national 4.5 pts vs national
39.8%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
up from national +4.1 pts vs national
14%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
down from national 0.1 pts vs national

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
134,869
Population
71,043
Labor Force
Employed
67,348
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.3% up from 2024 +0.4 pts vs 2024
Mean Commute 2 min below national avg
24.9 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
14.6%
Labor Force and Employed are ACS 5-Year survey estimates; the Unemployment Rate above comes from BLS LAUS, a separate monthly survey with its own methodology. The two won't reconcile by subtracting one from the other.
Key Takeaways
  • Income premium: Households earn well above the national median, supporting strong retail and housing markets.
  • Cost of living erodes income: Local prices run 12.6% above the national average, so the nominal median of $111,471 is worth $98,997 at national average prices. BEA publishes price parity at metro level, not county level.
  • Aging population: Median age of 43 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$14.6B up from 2023 +0.8% vs 2023
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
+0.8% real (inflation-adjusted) · +4% nominal · 2023 to 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · level and nominal change from CAGDP2 (current dollars); real change from CAGDP9 (chained 2017 dollars), both all-industry total. The two series agree in 2017, the chain reference year, and diverge by the amount of price change since.
112.6
Cost of Living · metro · Above Avg

Top Private-Sector Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual · Private sector only, with government shown below
Top private-sector industries by employment in Napa County, California, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage. Government employment is excluded and reported separately below the table.
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Manufacturing
13,980 22.5%
$87,726
2Accommodation and Food Services
11,959 19.3%
$48,659
3Health Care and Social Assistance
9,449 15.2%
$70,738
4Retail Trade
6,374 10.3%
$45,088
5Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
5,738 9.2%
$57,335
6Construction
4,086 6.6%
$100,027
7Administrative and Support and Waste Management
3,940 6.3%
$53,739
8Transportation and Warehousing
2,254 3.6%
$62,900
9Other Services (except Public Administration)
2,195 3.5%
$54,807
10Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
2,086 3.4%
$103,311
Government employment · context only
10,377

Public-sector jobs are not in the table above and are not part of any share or location quotient on this page. Both are measured on the private economy only, 68,695 private jobs in 2025: every location quotient divides by that total, and the Share of Top 10 column divides by the 10 sectors listed above. Private employment is the standard basis for measuring industry concentration because government employment mostly serves the resident population rather than an outside market. Nothing on this card is expected to add up with the government figure.

Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest private-sector industry: Manufacturing employs 13,980 workers (22.5% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $87,726. Every industry figure on this page is private sector; government employs a further 10,377 and is counted separately.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $14.6B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services averages $103,311 while Retail Trade averages $45,088, a 2.3x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Chart source: BLS QCEW · broad NAICS supersector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share. The same supersector axes appear on every profile, so the shape can be compared across counties.
Concentrated Industries
List source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · private sector · Location Quotient vs. national private-sector employment share.
Same source and same private-sector basis as the Top Industries table above. These sit at a finer level than the chart's supersector axes, so the two sets of values are not directly comparable. The sub-sector view surfaces specialization the supersector view masks, such as Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing here.
Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
66.91x
11,327
Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
17.86x
3,492
Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation
16.56x
258
Accommodation
5.11x
5,058
Private Households
1.69x
179

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
5 sub-sectors at LQ ≥ 1.5
Largest grouping among them is Manufacturing Cluster at 55.8% of the employment across all of them, which signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
20,314
Employment in the sub-sectors listed
66.91x
Peak sub-sector LQ
Sub-Sector Detail
Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing
66.91x 11,327
Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
17.86x 3,492
Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation
16.56x 258
Accommodation
5.11x 5,058
Private Households
1.69x 179

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, screened against local siting constraints. Source: BLS QCEW
0.20x
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
71 employed
Energy-intensive sector in a state where industrial electricity costs 2.51x the national average.
0.21x
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods
376 employed
0.25x
Credit Intermediation and Related Activities
336 employed
0.28x
Telecommunications
86 employed
Screened on industrial power cost, rail-truck intermodal access, land base. Industrial electricity in California costs 21.62¢/kWh against 8.62¢/kWh nationally (2025). California has 30 rail-truck intermodal terminals, the nearest 48 miles from the county. Land area 752 sq mi, larger than 64% of US counties. Sources: EIA, BTS NTAD, Census Gazetteer.
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing concentrates at 66.91x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 5 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, but 55.8% of the employment across them depends on one source of demand: goods manufacturing. Read the count as depth within that single demand base rather than as spread across separate ones.
  • Attraction whitespace: 4 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5 with at least 50 employed, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Napa County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064, B25004
$869,500 up from the baseline named below
Median Home Value vs 2019
$2,237 up from the baseline named below
Rent/Mo vs 2019
63.4% down from the baseline named below
Owner-Occ vs 2019
10.8% down from the baseline named below
Vacancy vs 2019
2.4% available
for rent or sale
7.8x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Stretched
vs. ~4.1x national average
Based on available federal declaration records, this 2020-2024 window includes a federally declared fire in 2020; a few measures here may reflect that and are best read with it in mind.

HUD Fair Market Rents

HUD publishes these by FMR area, which may cover more than one county · Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026 · Affordability threshold and renter cost burden from Census ACS B25119, B25070
Studio
$2,286/mo
1 Bedroom
$2,526/mo
2 Bedroom
$3,315/mo
3 Bedroom
$4,222/mo
4 Bedroom
$4,942/mo
30% of monthly median renter household income (~$2,045/mo, from a renter median of $81,786) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Measured: 52.2% of renter households already pay 30% or more of income on rent, and 25.3% pay 50% or more.
Key Takeaways
  • Stretched market: Home value to income ratio of 7.8x is well above the ~4.1x national average; attainable workforce housing may be a recruitment friction.
  • Elevated vacancy: 10.8% of housing units are vacant, above the California rate of 7.5%, and down from 12.4% in 2019.
  • Mostly second homes: seasonal, recreational and occasional-use units are 51.5% of vacant units, so the headline rate is not available supply.
  • Genuinely available supply: units listed for rent or for sale are 22.1% of the vacant stock, or 2.4% of all housing units against the 10.8% headline vacancy rate. Absorbable supply for an incoming employer is thin, and the gap between the two is the redevelopment and conversion opportunity.
  • Rent affordability gap: None of the 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom sizes sit below what a household on the median renter income of $81,786 can pay without cost burden (~$2,045/mo), and 52.2% of renter households are already cost-burdened, 25.3% severely so; workforce housing cost burden warrants attention.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23001, B23025, B08303, B08301
80,188 down from the baseline named below
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 2 min below national avg
24.9 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
14.6%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
84%
of prime-age population
Prime-age rate numerator is civilian employed (B23001); the denominator is total population aged 25-54 (B01001), which also includes armed forces.
Labor force participation rate: 63.3%, the labor force as a share of the population aged 16 and over (ACS B23025) 63% Participation
of population age 16 and over (112,410)
down from 2019 vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · College Scorecard
Bachelor's+
39.8% up from 2019 vs 2019
HS Diploma+
85.1% down from 2019 vs 2019
Institutions in Napa County
2 institutions in Napa County reporting credentials to College Scorecard
Credentials awarded in Napa County
1,229/yr
Napa Valley College 1,005/yr
Pacific Union College 224/yr

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
22.6%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Same cohort is 13.4% of total population, the basis used in the Demographics cohort chart.
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
41.4%
Service
18.9%
Sales & Office
18.9%
Construction / Maint.
9.7%
Production / Transport
11.2%
Bars are drawn on a 0% to 60% axis, so bar length is proportional to actual share. Labels give each group's share of 67,348 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 22.6% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Healthy participation: 63.3% labor force participation reflects a steady, available local workforce.
  • Talent pipeline: 2 institutions in Napa County award 1,229 credentials a year. Employers drawing from a wider labor shed should read this alongside institutions outside the county, which this page does not aggregate.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

Sample output. Pulse AI analysis draws on 10 federal data sources.

Sample AI Insight

Napa County shows strong potential for beverage and tobacco product manufacturing attraction, with a 66.91x concentration and 11,327 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 22.6% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

Most of the employment across the concentrated sub-sectors traces back to a single source of demand. Goods manufacturing accounts for 55.8% of it, all of it in beverage and tobacco product manufacturing. Recruitment that widens the demand base changes that exposure; recruitment inside the same base deepens it.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
BEA Regional Price Parity2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026
College ScorecardAY 2022-23

American Community Survey figures on this page are 2020-2024 five-year averages rather than single-year counts. A five-year estimate pools 60 months of survey responses, so each value describes the period as a whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Napa County, California, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Napa County, California?

134,869 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Napa County, California?

$111,471 in nominal dollars (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates). Adjusted for local prices using the BEA all-items regional price parity for Napa, CA (112.6 against a national average of 100), that is $98,997 at national average prices. BEA publishes regional price parity at metro level; there is no county-level figure.

What is the unemployment rate in Napa County, California?

4.3% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Napa County, California?

$14.6B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP2).